Central Investigation Bureau Probes Alleged 71 Million Baht Fraud Case Involving Famous Lawyer.

Bangkok: The Central Investigation Bureau has launched an inquiry into allegations against a renowned lawyer accused of defrauding investors. Pol. Lt. Gen. Jiraphop, the Commander-in-Chief of the Central Investigation Bureau, has appointed a special working group to look into the case where the lawyer reportedly deceived Ms. Oi into investing, placing Pol. Maj. Gen. Suwat, Deputy Commander-in-Chief, at the helm of the investigation team. The authorities have assured that any discovered misconduct will be pursued to the full extent of the law. According to Thai News Agency, Pol. Lt. Gen. Jiraphop Phuridet and Pol. Maj. Gen. Montree Thesakan have provided an update on the ongoing interrogation of Ms. Chatuphon, also known as 'Jao Oi,' who has lodged a complaint against the lawyer, referred to as Lawyer Tum. The complaint alleges fraud in connection with an online lottery business investment, culminating in a financial loss exceeding 71 million baht. Pol. Maj. Gen. Montree noted that while Ms. Oi's questioning continues, other related aspects of the investigation are also being pursued. The investigation is also examining claims that Lawyer Tum coerced Ms. Oi into transferring 39 million baht under the pretense of debt repayment to an associate. Presently, the inquiry encompasses the relationship between Ms. Oi and Lawyer Tum and the details surrounding their acquaintance to ascertain the basis for any criminal charges. The working group, led by Pol. Maj. Gen. Suwat Saengnum, is actively compiling case information, and relevant agencies may be consulted if necessary. The police have emphasized impartiality and adherence to legal protocols in handling the case. The decision regarding the issuance of a summons or arrest warrant is still under deliberation, contingent on the investigation's findings. With over 70-80% of Ms. Oi's testimony already recorded, the process remains ongoing due to the case's complexity. The authorities are unable to predict the precise duration required to conclude the questioning.