Bangkok: A Pheu Thai spokesperson has called on the government to disclose the details of the “Rare Earth Minerals MOU,” citing concerns over its lack of transparency and strategic direction, which may undermine the country’s credibility. The spokesperson criticized recent APEC achievements, claiming they are merely continuations from the Pheu Thai era and lack new policies, with leaders’ visions being far from ideal.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Suksit Srijomkhwan, the spokesman for the Pheu Thai Party, addressed the media on issues related to “Creating an Image to Cover Up Failures and Wrong Foreign Policy.” He questioned the government about the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on Rare Earth Minerals and the outcomes of the recent APEC meeting. Despite the potential benefits of exploring rare earths, the Pheu Thai Party expressed concerns over the government’s lack of transparency and strategic planning, particularly regarding environmental and national interests.
The party emphasized that rare earth exploration should align with long-term investment strategies to support high-tech and clean energy industries. However, the government’s current approach has raised concerns about transparency with the public and protection of national interests, as well as Thailand’s credibility on the global stage.
Mr. Suksit pointed out that documents usually declassified and published after Cabinet approval were kept secret, with information only emerging after the US released documents. The lack of public debate on the agreement’s pros and cons has been noted. Attempts to find the MOU document through official channels were unsuccessful, leading to suspicions about other undisclosed government actions.
He also criticized the government’s inaction on addressing mining contamination in neighboring countries, despite prior efforts by the Pheu Thai government to collaborate with Myanmar. The neglect of such issues poses risks to public health and the environment.
The government’s claim that the MOU can be revoked at any time was seen as a sign of policy instability, potentially damaging Thailand’s position internationally. The lack of clarity surrounding the MOU could also affect investor confidence, harming the country’s credibility and reputation in the long term.
Furthermore, Mr. Suksit addressed the government’s claims of success at the APEC meeting, including increased investment and rice sales to China, which he attributed to past efforts by the Pheu Thai Party. He questioned the government’s lack of new proposals and criticized its focus on the MoU for rare earths and negotiations for an Entertainment Complex over more pressing issues like gray capital suppression and infrastructure development.