Bangkok: Rangsiman Rome, a party-list MP from the People's Party, has responded to the Election Commission's (EC) statement regarding potential collusion involving "Orange" senators. Rangsiman questioned the labeling of any senators as "Orange," contrasting it with how some senators identify as "Blue." He criticized the notion of mutual wrongdoing, emphasizing that the People's Democratic Party (PDP) has not shielded anyone from accountability. Rangsiman urged the EC to disclose names and evidence, insisting on uniform standards for all involved.
According to Thai News Agency, Rangsiman commented on three additional Senate collusion cases linking "Orange Senators" with the People's Party and the Progressive Movement. He asserted that no senator self-identifies as "Orange." Instead, such labeling arises from scrutiny by the opposition and civil society, leading to stereotypes equating corruption among different groups. Rangsiman remarked on the peculiar reality of this situation, advocating for equal treatment among senators.
The People's Party reiterated its stance against discrimination among senators, calling for equal standards for everyone. Whether allegations involve the People's Party, independent senators, or "Blue" senators, the evidence should determine the course of action. The party clarified that the summoning of "Orange" senators was to ascertain their self-identification, a certainty that "Blue" senators possess.
Rangsiman also highlighted the need to define "cheating the Senate," distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate actions. He questioned whether hiring individuals to manipulate votes with financial incentives constitutes cheating, stressing the importance of differentiating such actions.
Rangsiman referenced comments by Anutin, suggesting a focus on behavior over identity. He invited the Election Commission to present evidence and names of implicated People's Party politicians, assuring their cooperation. The People's Party plans an internal investigation while emphasizing that electoral cheating differs from senators forming groups or websites. The illegal activity, he noted, involves monetary payments for fraudulent candidacies.
Rangsiman concluded that the issue transcends political affiliations. Cheating in Senate elections must be addressed regardless of party identity. The EC is urged to investigate thoroughly, tracing financial and communication records to uncover any connections.