Parliament, "Sonthiya" asks the Speaker of the House to investigate "Thanathorn" sitting on the committee to transfer military business. Objection to the Constitution or not? I would like to ask "Pitha" about the suitability of receiving back salary even though she has not worked. Demanding to move forward and not bring down the House again. Mr. Sonthiya Sawatdee, former advisor to the House of Representatives Legislative Committee Submit a letter to Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor Matha, Speaker of the National Assembly, asked to investigate the case of Mr. Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit. Head of the Progressive Committee Is a special committee to consider and study guidelines for transferring military business to other agencies. Is the appointment of the committee in accordance with the 2020 Ethics Regulations or not and is it contrary to the Constitution or not? Mr. Thanathorn has been deprived of political rights for the remaining 5 years and is a suspect in a forest encroachment case. and is an accused under Sect ion 112 'An outsider can be a commissioner. But the qualifications must not conflict with the Constitution and the Council's regulations, and it is not said whether Mr. Thanathorn has qualifications that conflict with the Constitution or the Council's regulations. By requesting that the Prajadhipok be the judge. Both the policies that Mr. Thanathorn used in campaigning for elections or those related to criminal cases I think it's against ethics. Ask the Speaker of the National Assembly to inquire with Mr. Pitha. Limcharoenrat Former leader of the Forward Party and MPs from the progressive party list As I am one of the people who submitted a request to the Election Commission (EC) to investigate Mr. Pitha's shareholding in ITV, Mr. Pitha and the Kao Klai Party stated that the past 6 months were a waste of time. Who is responsible? So I asked again that when the opposition and progressive party submitted a request to the Constitutional Court to interpret the 8-year term of Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha and was tempor arily suspended from performing duties for 1 month, who was responsible?" Mr. Sonthiya said. Mr. Sonthiya said that he would like to ask about the salary of Mr. Pitha and his assistants. The court ordered him to stop performing his duties for 6 months, a total of 1 million, 4 hundred thousand baht. Will he accept it or not? Even though it is a right to be able to receive back salary, the question is asked about suitability because for the past 6 months, Mr. Pitha has not work Therefore, it sets a standard for other MPs from now on. The reason why he brought up the case of Gen. Prayut to compare. Because Mr. Pitha's case was delayed by the court for 6 months because Mr. Pitha requested an adjournment of the court for 2 months, he asked about the appropriateness of receiving salary during the period when he was not working. Mr. Sonthiya mentioned the meeting of the House of Representatives in 2019, which was attended by the opposition party at that time. Including the Progressive Party, which brought down the House of Representatives 27 times. I would like to urge the Progressive Party not to destroy the House. Another collapse in this era and that "If the Constitutional Court If there is one resolution on January 31st, I have a point to continue. That is, he called for Mr. Pitha to confirm clearly that Youth who violate Section 112 will be brought in to participate in the amnesty law that the party has advanced. Is it proposed to the council as well? Source: Thai News Agency