Bangkok: "Thepthai" advises "Phawut" to clarify the 28 million baht issue and face the truth regarding its connection to the Forex case. Political observer Thepthai Senpong posted a message on his Facebook page, "Thepthai - Political Talk," advising Pawut to face the truth.
According to Thai News Agency, the press conference held by the DSI Director-General raised suspicions about the financial transactions of Mr. Pawut Pongwitayaphanu, a list MP from the People's Party, and their alleged connection to the Forex case. Criticism arose suggesting that the press conference was an act of retaliation against Mr. Pawut for exposing the AI Passport project of Mr. Chaiyanok Chidchob, the Minister of Digital Economy and Society. The public is now eagerly awaiting Mr. Pawut's response to these serious allegations.
Since the initial press conference, Mr. Pawut has avoided direct media engagement. This could be attributed to his unpreparedness to address the specifics surrounding the allegations. However, the DSI Director-General pointed to a suspicious money trail involving 14 transfers of 2 million baht each, totaling 28 million baht. The media and public are seeking a direct explanation from Mr. Pawut regarding these transactions.
In response to being implicated in the Forex case, Mr. Pawut took to his personal Facebook account to announce that he is in the process of preparing information to clarify the facts to the DSI. He assured that he would fully cooperate with authorities and mentioned that the incident occurred several years ago, necessitating time to gather the relevant documents and evidence. He has requested information from financial institutions to support his clarification to the DSI and political parties.
While Mr. Pawut's preparation of evidence to clarify matters with the DSI is necessary, it is also crucial for him to address the public directly through press conferences or interviews. This transparency would help dispel any lingering suspicions. His avoidance of media engagement, coupled with his absence from committee or subcommittee meetings, has fueled public curiosity and suspicion about his motives and actions.
Thepthai, as an independent political analyst, suggests that Mr. Pawut should seize the opportunity to speak publicly, presenting evidence and addressing any doubts. If Mr. Pawut is confident in his innocence, he should have no reservations about facing the public and media. This proactive approach could also counter accusations that the DSI is being politically manipulated. However, his reluctance to engage raises questions about possible vulnerabilities in his position.
Mr. Pawut's confidence in his evidence should motivate him to confront society and the media, thereby restoring his reputation and diminishing public suspicion. The public has previously held a skeptical view of the DSI, but Mr. Pawut's withdrawal from public scrutiny has left many questioning the legitimacy of both parties.